Legal Opinion

Randall S. Zane, M.D. and Michael J. Burke, M.D. v. Kelley Brooke Surber, Individually, and on Behalf of the Estate of William Tate Surber, and as Next Frind of Loren Bailey Surber And, Nicholas Tate Surber, Minors

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 8, 2006No. 13-02-00360-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-02-360-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

RANDALL S. ZANE, M.D.

AND MICHAEL J. BURKE, M.D., Appellants,

v.

KELLY BROOKE SURBER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND

ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM

TATE SURBER, DECEASED, AND AS NEXT

FRIEND OF LOREN BAILEY SURBER AND,

NICHOLAS TATE SURBER, MINORS, Appellees.

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

DISSENTING OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez and Castillo

Dissenting Opinion by Justice Castillo

With respect to Dr. Burke's first issue presented, I would hold that the evidence is legally insufficient…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API