Randall S. Zane, M.D. and Michael J. Burke, M.D. v. Kelley Brooke Surber, Individually, and on Behalf of the Estate of William Tate Surber, and as Next Frind of Loren Bailey Surber And, Nicholas Tate Surber, Minors
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
NUMBER 13-02-360-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
RANDALL S. ZANE, M.D.
AND MICHAEL J. BURKE, M.D., Appellants,
v.
KELLY BROOKE SURBER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND
ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM
TATE SURBER, DECEASED, AND AS NEXT
FRIEND OF LOREN BAILEY SURBER AND,
NICHOLAS TATE SURBER, MINORS, Appellees.
On appeal from the 28th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
DISSENTING OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez and Castillo
Dissenting Opinion by Justice Castillo
With respect to Dr. Burke's first issue presented, I would hold that the evidence is legally insufficient…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.