People v. Alaniz
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
VALLÉE, J.
I dissent. The evidence is without con flict that the arrest was made solely on information received from one or more so-called informers. The attorney general so conceded at the argument. As I read the prevailing opinion, it holds that an arrest may be made solely on such information. Until the Supreme Court in unequivocal language says it is the law that information given by one or more informers is sufficient in itself to constitute probable cause for a police officer to believe a person has committed a felony and thus justify the arrest of that person, I cannot concur in such a…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.