Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1917No. 6033PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from ' Superior Court, Oklahoma County; Edward D. Oldfield, Judge. Action by the State of Oklahoma and the officers composing the Commissioners of the Land Office on relation of J. H Chambers, their attorney, against the United States Fidelity & (Guaranty Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant livings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

This action was commenced by the state and the officers composing the commissioners of the land office, on the relation of J. H. Chambers, their attorney, against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company to recover $50,000 on a bond executed by it as a depository bond for the Columbia Bank & Trust Company. Answer was filed, consisting of a general denial and certain affirmative defenses, to which demurrer was interposed toy plaintiffs, and by th,e court sustained as to all of said defenses except the general denial, and exceptions saved to the ruling of the court. Thereafter the ease…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mothersead v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API