Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rivera v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1990Published

1Dissent

Sullivan and Smith, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Smith, J., as follows: I would reverse the judgment because (1) the trial court refused to charge on the law which is applic*136able when a motorman is faced with an emergency situation; (2) the jury verdict was against the weight of the evidence; (3) the court permitted the jury to consider more than 150 rules and regulations with no guidance, including a rule which the Court of Appeals has held is inadmissible; and (4) the award was excessive.

Plaintiffs husband, Milton Rivera (Rivera) was struck and killed by a train when he fell from a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cassano v. HagstromNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Topel v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BarileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Marx v. Ontario Beach Hotel & Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API