Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company v. Luther W. McLain
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentKing, Justice
¶ 28. Because a trial court’s order' imposing sanctions is reviewed for abuse of discretion, and because dismissal of an action is reserved for thé most extreme circumstances, I believe that the trial judge did not abuse her discretion in issuing monetary sanctions. ’ Further, I believe that the majority’s holding to dismiss McLain’s ease without remanding to the trial court for reconsideration of greater sanctions would require this Court to adopt a per se rule of dismissal in cases involving perjury.4 Accordingly, I dissent.
¶29. This Court will affirm a trial court’s imposition of sanctions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amiker v. Drugs for Less, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Pierce v. Heritage Properties, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Ladner v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Scoggins v. Ellzey Beverages, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.