Legal Opinion
Vann v. Vandenbrook
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 2, 2009No. 3:09-cr-00007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
This is a proposed civil action for monetary and injunctive relief brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Petitioner Barry Anthony Vann alleges that respondents were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Petitioner claims that respondents Mike Vandenbrook and Officer John Doe 1 were deliberately indifferent by not placing petitioner on observation status when he informed them that he was suicidal. In addition, petitioner contends that respondents R.N. Steve Helgerson, Dylon Radtke and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pruitt v. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- George v. Sonoma County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Versey-James v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Washington v. O'NealDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Washington v. O'NealDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021