Legal Opinion
Channel Master Corp. v. Silverman
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.
Plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction against picketing at its place of business and related activity.
*1095Plaintiff contends the defendant unions’ picketing is unlawful recognition picketing, directed at plaintiff, calculated to coerce plaintiff to influence its employees to join defendant unions, and enjoinable on the authority of Goodwins Inc. v. Hagedorn (303 N.Y. 300 [1951]).
Defendants contend their picketing is peaceful, conducted for “ organizational” purposes, and, on the authority of Wood v. O’Grady (307 N. Y. 532 [1954]) not enjoinable.
Whatever the force of these contentions,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen, Local No. 427 v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- B. C. Manufacturing Co. v. ReiffNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Clinton Footwear Corp. v. HonigNew York Supreme Court · 1958