Legal Opinion

Wolff v. McDonnell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 1974No. 73-679PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

418 U.S. 539 (1974)

WOLFF, WARDEN, ET AL.

v.

McDONNELL.

No. 73-679.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 22, 1974.

Decided June 26, 1974.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Melvin Kent Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General of Nebraska, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General.

Douglas F. Duchek, by appointment of the Court, 415 U. S. 974, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the briefs was Robert Plotkin.

Solicitor General Bork argued the cause for the United States as amicus…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · White; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Marshall; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Douglas.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Michael Hayes v. Idaho Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Nick Mangiaracina v. Paul PenzoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. State v. GuytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Shorter v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API