Legal Opinion

Heinecke v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1959No. 2428PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

A jury denied plaintiff recovery in his suit for injuries against Western Union. The sole error assigned in this appeal is the trial court’s refusal to give an instruction on the doctrine of last clear chance.

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he was struck by a Western Union messenger on a bicycle while crossing the street. His testimony tended to establish that after getting off a streetcar at a loading platform he checked the oncoming traffic from his position on the platform. Seeing none, he started to make his way to the opposite curb and had taken two steps into…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. Century Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. Landfair v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  3. Grant v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Griffin v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. District of Columbia v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Johnson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  4. District of Columbia v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API