Legal Opinion

Williams v. Conerly

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 2, 2003No. S03A0043; S03A0044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

Appellants Helen Stacey and Mary Williams appeal from a judgment in a partitioning action filed against them by appellees Emaly Conerly, Robert Culpepper, India Dennis, and James Culpepper. Appellee C. M. Stripling was a named defendant in the action. The appellants raise several issues regarding the trial court’s judgment, but for the reasons that follow, we find no merit to the contentions and affirm.

All parties are brothers and sisters, except for Mr. Stripling, who was a former business partner of the siblings’ father. The partitioning action concerned two tracts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huntley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Jennings v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferman v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API