Hunt v. Mann
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Weit OB' ENTBY to recover a parcel of land in Rehoboth. Plea, nul disseisin. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Allen, J., the jury returned a verdict for' the demandant; and the tenant alleged exceptions. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Endicott, J,
The tenant in this case had been in possession of the demanded premises for several years, claiming title thereto under a deed from her daughter; and evidence was offered, tending to show that the consideration for the conveyance to the daughter was in fact paid by the husband of the tenant, and that the conveyance to the daughter, and from her to the tenant, were made for the purpose of defeating, delaying and defrauding the creditors of the tenant’s husband. An action was brought against the husband by the demandant, and his interest in the land in question was attached.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sohier v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cunningham v. BrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Lyons v. UrgalonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- FinniganMassachusetts Land Court · 1902
- Rooney v. YoungMassachusetts Land Court · 1906