Succession of King
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; H. F. Brunot, Judge. In the matter of the succession of A. M. King. From the settlement of the provisional account, the curator appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
Decedent died in the parish of East Baton Rouge in April, 1905, leaving what was regarded as an intestate and vacant estate, of which appellant, claiming to be the largest creditor, was appointed curator, after a contest in which the state of Louisiana, Thomas E. McHugh, -and M. F. Amrheim participated. In December, 1905, he filed a provisional account, showing assets to the value of $8,312.12 and debts (including his own claim for $944) to the amount of $2,792.92. The attorney for absent heirs opposed the claim of the curator, and in January, 1906, the account…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. RoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Glenn v. WestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- National Union v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Succession of v. TterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Richey v. BrasherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.