Legal Opinion

Thibert v. Thibert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1958No. 58-334PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The final decree appealed from in this cause, being a summary final decree cancel-ling certain instruments, is affirmed, except as to the provision therein for attorneys’' fees for plaintiff’s attorneys; and the order for attorneys’ fees, having been entered in the absence of any provision for such fees, by statute or by contract, must be and hereby is reversed, on authority of Brite v. Orange Belt Securities Co., 133 Fla. 266, 182 So. 892. See also Hoffman v. Barlly, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 355, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brite, Et Vir v. Orange Belt Securities Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Hoffman v. BarllyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation v. PostolDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Campbell v. MazeSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Royal-Globe Insurance Cos. v. Indian River Gas Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Ginsberg v. GinsbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Carbrell Corp. v. Phil C. Gallagher Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API