Farm & Home Investment Co. v. Gannon
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Acting Presiding Judge.
The source of this litigation is a water main extension contract between defendants-appellants property owners and the City of DeSoto. Plaintiff-respondent, which sought to tap on to the water line, objected to the proposed fee to be charged and challenged the validity of the contract by declaratory action. The trial court found the contract void and that the water main had been dedicated to public use. We reverse and remand for a determination of the reasonableness of the tap-on fee.
Defendants were the developers of a shopping center within the city limits of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Stewart v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Connell v. Jersey Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Fulton National Bank v. Callaway Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Cheatham v. MeltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Lamar Company, LLC v. City of Columbia, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Opinion No. (1984), Missouri Attorney General Reports1984
- Riney v. City of HannibalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State ex rel. Darin Gilley and Karen Dean v. County Commission of Franklin County, and Landvatter Enterprises, LLC, Intervenor/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020