Legal Opinion

Liesemer v. Burg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Louis J. Liesemer against John Burg. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Suit is brought to recover a balance of $171.66, with interest from February 9, 1891, upon a note made by defendant, payable to plaintiff, and also two installments of interest, amounting to $90, collected by defendant upon a note made by one Biddle, and payable to plaintiff. Defendant sought to set off a claim for 34 weeks’ board, care, etc., of plaintiff’s daughter, a child of four years of age. Plaintiff recovered a judgment of $161.51.

Error is assigned upon the rejection of testimony tending to show the character and standing of plaintiff, and the expectancy of the child, as bearing upon…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merrill v. LeisenringMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cornelissen v. OrtMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Farmers' Warehouse Ass'n v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Morris v. ReymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Detroit Electric Light & Power Co. v. ApplebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API