Holloway v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The two causes were argued together before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattison, Henee, Stockbr-idüe and Constable, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtConstable, J.
John Q. A. Holloway died, seized of a large estate, leaving surviving him a widow, three sons and one daughter. By his last will he created what is commonly called a spendthrift trust, for the benefit of his son, John E. Holloway, and named the Safe Deposit and Trust Company of Baltimore trustee thereof. By the terms of the will the trustee was to hold the estate in trust for the son for his life, and thereafter for the benefit of the descendants of the son, but in default whereof, at his death, the principal was to- pass to, or be held in trust for, other children of the testator surviving,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berrett v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1835
- Hitch v. FenbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Presstman v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Hitch v. FenbyHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re MuellerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Backus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Zewadski v. BarksdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Holloway v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915