Ermentraut v. Providence-Washington Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of tin* district Court for Hennepin county, Elliott, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $525.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is one of a series of cases brought by plaintiffs against different insurance companies to recover the amounts alleged to be due upon fire policies covering plaintiffs’ elevator building. Several of these cases have been before this court, but this is the first to reach us in which there has been a verdict upon the merits. ■In view of the fact that the testimony covers more than 650 pages of the paper book, it is to be regretted that the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial must be reversed.
Plaintiffs’ elevator adjoined a feed mill owned by another party. It was plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schneider v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dunbar v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re Estate of BoeseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Julio Diniero v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Eischen v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Boese v. LangleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942