Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On the call of the calendar this action to recover

damages because of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant was marked settled. Thereafter when the plaintiff learned of the proposed settlement, a motion was made to restore the case to the calendar for trial. That the plaintiff intended to try the case was shown by the fact that prior to the time the case appeared for trial the plaintiff’s attorney retained trial counsel.

An offer to pay $150 in settlement of the action was thereafter made to trial counsel but was refused. It is alleged that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . DuaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Sherman & Sons Co. v. Princess Shirt Waist Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacob v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Mazzella v. American Home Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Altenau v. MastersonNew York City Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API