Bonds v. Bonds
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
Brendalyn Bonds filed an application for discretionary appeal from an order of the trial court modifying child custody. We granted her application primarily to address her argument that the trial court erred in failing to include in its order any findings of fact. This enumeration, as well as others raised, is without merit.
1. The trial court did not err in failing to make specific findings of fact. Under former law, it was mandatory in a contested child custody case for the trial judge to include findings of fact in its final order. See Haralson v. Moore, 236 Ga. 131,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Githens v. GithensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Burks v. FIRST UNION MORTGAGE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Haralson v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Poor v. Leader Federal Bank for SavingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Goodman v. Lake Buckhorn Estates Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Leuvan v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Stanford v. PogueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017