Legal Opinion
In re VAXART, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 19, 2026No. 3:20-cv-05949Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re VAXART, INC. SECURITIES Case No. 20-cv-05949-VC LITIGATION. ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE Re: Dkt. Nos. 539, 551, 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 557, 558, 559, 571 This summarizes the Court’s rulings on the parties’ motions in limine and motions to exclude expert testimony. As a reminder, a ruling on a motion in limine may be revisited at trial depending upon how the evidence comes in. See City of Pomona v. SQM North America Corporation,
866 F.3d 1060, 1070
(9th Cir. 2017). The defendants’ motion to exclude expert Matthew Cain’s opinions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Arnold B. ELKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. LIGGETT & MYERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kaplan v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014