Legal Opinion

Williams v. Colwell

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion at Special Term to compel purchaser at foreclosure sale to complete purchase.

1Opinion of the CourtLaughlin, J.

On the sale of the premises, described in the complaint, by referee duly appointed for that purpose in the judgment of’ foreclosure and sale, one Ernest C. Hazard purchased the same for the sum ,of $1,000, subject to. certain incumbrances. The referee’s deed, duly executed, was tendered to Hazard: He declined to complete the purchase upon the ground that the Daily Mercantile Review, in which the notice of sale was published, was not a newspaper within the intent and meaning of the- provision of the Code of Civil Procedure, with reference to publication of notices of sale of real estate in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Kellogg v. CarricoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Hull v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Hernandez v. DrakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Benkendorf v. VincenzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Times Printing Co. v. Star Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hanscom v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State Ex Rel. Yaegar v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Culclasure v. Consolidated Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Hall v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API