Legal Opinion

Muhling v. Sattler

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 28, 1860PublishedCited by 1 opinion

CASE 20 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL FROM JEFFÍJRSON CIRCUIT COURT. cited 5 Mon., 6; Oberdorfer vs. Albaker, MS. opinion, October, 1858.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stites

This suit was brought on two promissory notes drawn by Muhling, payable to the order of himself, and by him endorsed to the appellees. The notes seem to have been executed in Louisville, Kentucky, but are made payable and negotiable at the office of the appellees, in the city of New York.

The petition simply alleges that the appellees are the holders and owners of the notes, by assignment from the payee, Muhling; and avers that they are wholly unpaid, though payment was demanded at the proper place in New York. The notes, together with the assignments, are referred to and filed as parts of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allin v. Shadburne'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833
  2. Morrison v. Stockwell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central Consumers Co. v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API