Legal Opinion

Faber v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided May 26, 1999No. 1:98cv794Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILLMAN, Senior District Judge.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2)(A) to quash four administrative summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service. Two of the summonses were issued on October 23, 1998, and two were issued on October 26, 1998. The summonses were directed to Huntington Bank in Parma, OH; the CU Financial Group in Grand Rapids, MI; NBD Bank in Grand Rapids, MI; and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith, Inc. in Grand Rapids, MI. The summonses required production of bank, credit union and investment records pertaining to Thomas and Sharon Faber.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. BiscegliaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API