Legal Opinion
Love v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2011PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that it did not have notice of the condition that 'allegedly caused plaintiff to fall. Defendant’s caretaker testified that she followed the janitorial schedule pursuant to which she would have swept all the staircases in the morning, mopped the stairs any time she encountered a wet condition and informed the supervisor of any complaints she would receive.
Plaintiffs opposition does not raise a triable issue of fact. The evidence fails to demonstrate a specific recurring dangerous condition…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Berger v. ISK Manhattan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Rodriguez v. 520 Audubon AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pfeuffer v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Gautier v. 941 Intervale Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Meade v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Pagan v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Torres v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.