Legal Opinion

Lupfer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 21, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Baokes, V. C.

The counties of Atlantic and Burlington advertised for proposals for the building of a highway bridge spanning Mullica river on the Ocean boulevard, joining the. two counties. The complainants’'proposal was accompanied by a certified check for $5,000 as a good faith that they would sign the contract upon the acceptance of their bid. Their bid was the lowest, and upon an alleged award of the contract, and a default by the complainants, the counties declared the check forfeited. This suit is to invalidate the forfeiture and to recover the money.

The proposed bridge was to be of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. City of North BendNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. N. P. Contracting & Paving Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Hotel China & Glassware Co. v. Board of Public InstructionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Cataldo Constr. Co. v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. State v. Ernst & Young, LLPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  5. Carlin v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API