Legal Opinion

Mazzacco v. Purcell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1981No. 8021SC566Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

From his complaint, brief, and oral argument, we understand plaintiffs theory of his case to be that defendants were negligent when they failed to warn plaintiff of a dangerous situation which they created by tying one end of a rope to that portion of the tree being cut, passing the rope over the limb of a second tree, tying the other end of the rope to the trunk of a third tree, and pulling the slack in the rope between the second and third trees into a “bow like configuration” so that plaintiff, being on the “inside” of the rope, was propelled thirty to forty feet to his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Spell v. Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Sibbett v. M.C.M. Livestock, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Cagle ex rel. Beaty v. Robert Hall ClothesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API