Legal Opinion

Wright v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 7, 2016No. 15-1071PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Section 1256 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that an investor who holds certain types of derivatives at the close of the taxable year must “mark to market” those derivatives by treating them as having been sold for their fair market value on the last business day of the taxable year. A “foreign currency contract” is a “section 1256 contract” that an investor must mark to market at the end of the taxable year. I.R.C. § 1256(b)(1). Contending that a foreign currency option is within the definition of a “foreign currency contract” under § 1256, Cheryl and Terry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Limited, Inc., and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Leonard Greene and Joyce Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Summitt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  4. Wright v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Putanec v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API