Legal Opinion

Brinson Appliance, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 18, 1992No. 74645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Judge.

The Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) ruled that no sales tax was due on charges made by respondents, Brinson Appliance, Inc., and five affiliated companies1 (Slyman Bros.), for delivery and installation of household appliances. The Director of Revenue appealed the decision. The issues on appeal involve the construction of the statute imposing a sales tax, § 144.021.2 This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. The judgment is affirmed.

During the period between November of 1986 and November of 1990, Slyman Bros, was in the business of selling home appliances at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. Kurtz Concrete, Inc. v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Becker Electric Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blevins Asphalt Construction Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Alberici Constructors, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. Southern Red-E-Mix Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API