Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hyde

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 2, 1936No. 83PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The question here presented, like that in the preceding case of Helvering, Commissioner, v. Brooks (C.C.A.) 82 F.(2d) 173, is whether the respondent is taxable on income paid to his divorced wife under an irrevocable trust created by him for her benefit.

On October 29, 1918, the respondent Hyde and his wife entered into an agree ment, which was apparently made in Paris, France. After reciting that Mrs. Hyde was living separate from her husband and was about to institute an action for divorce from him, the agreement provided, among other things, for the custody of the child,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Schley v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Princess Lida of Thurn & TaxisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Simenon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  3. The BaymeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Goldman v. BeaudrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  5. Byron Jackson Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API