Legal Opinion

In re Sherman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 2, 1941No. 4498PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaNd, Judge

The Primary Examiner of tlie United States Patent Office rejected all of appellant’s claims — 1 to 16, inclusive — in an application for a patent relating to manifolding material. Upon appeal to the Board of Appeals, tlie decision of the examiner was affirmed.

Appellant regards claims 2-, 4, 6, 11, and 16 as illustrative, but we think it will be sufficient to regard claim 2 as illustrative. In doing so, we will call attention to certain features expressed in some of the other claims. Claim 2 reads as follows:

2. A manifolding assembly including a plurality of relatively adjustable superposed…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of BorcherdtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. The Weatherhead Company and Paul D. Wurzburger v. Drillmaster Supply Company and James E. Rutledge and Kenneth C. HornCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. In Re ChristmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. Preformed Line Products Co. v. Fanner Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
  5. De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API