Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Dade

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1947No. 508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant has moved for leave to file in the trial court statement of proceedings .and evidence, time for so doing having expired. Appellee has moved to docket and dismiss the appeal because of appellant’s failure to take the necessary steps for appeal within the time limited by our rules.

Notice of appeal was filed April 10. Under our Rule 27(g) the statement of proceedings and evidence was required to be filed within ten days from that date and the time could have been extended by the trial court, under Rule 27(h), for another ten days. Appellant neither filed the statement nor sought an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stroup v. HoweDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Graves v. MacDonaldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Bowers v. BasilikoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Nash v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phucas v. Washington-Virginia-Maryland Coach Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API