Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Continental Royalty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1940No. 9380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit, filed in trespass to try title to recover 101 acres of land before the new Federal rules took effect, was tried under the formal pleadings applicable in Texas to such actions. As established by the stipulation the unchallenged findings and the evidence brought up in the record, these are the controlling facts: (1) George Lilienstern is the common source of title; (2) on November 15, 1917, he conveyed to McPeters by warranty deed the 101 acre tract of land involved in the suit. (3) This deed was filed for record on November 15 and was recorded on November 16,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gorham v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Gates v. AsherTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gates v. AsherTexas Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API