Creek Nation v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
These actions were originally brought in 1926 under special jurisdictional acts of 1924, which gave the Court of Claims jurisdiction over claims under “any treaty or agreement between the United States” and these tribes.1 *631The actions were based on a contention that the United States had breached its obligation as a guardian of its Indian wards in failing to collect the sums described below. The Court of Claims sustained a demurrer to the first complaint, on the ground that the special jurisdictional acts permitted actions brought on specific statutory or treaty pledges only, and not actions…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern Rhode Island Land Development Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
- United States v. L.J. Garner and Tommie N. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Anglin & StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.