Legal Opinion

Mau v. Rice Bros.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 20, 1933No. 41582PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaussen, J.

I. In two paragraphs of the copy of the lease attached to the petition, the terms “lessee” and “lessor” were interchanged, wherever used. During the trial of the case this error was discovered, and the petition'was amended by substituting a correct copy of the lease in lieu of the incorrect copy attached' to the pleading as an exhibit. Appellant complains of the action of the court in permitting the amendment to be filed. No prejudice coiild result to appellant from the amendment, as the paragraphs in which the errors occurred, related to matters entirely immaterial to any issue on trial. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lee v. Coon Rapids National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Beck v. Minnesota & Western Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Dilenbeck v. Security Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Nelson v. District Court of Wabasha CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Cheyne v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. Rice Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Bunn v. WalchWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Mason City and Clear Lake R. Co. v. Imperial Seed Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1957
  5. Corydon State Bank v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API