McKeown v. Bank for Savings
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court, affirming an order of the Special Term of the City Court making one Alexander McKeown a party defendant in this action.
1Opinion of the CourtFbeedman, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order affirming an order granting a motion made by the defendant under section 115 of the Laws of 1892, chapter 689, known as the “ Banking Law ” to have one Alexander McKeown made a party defendant in this action. Under the decision in the case of Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank, 16 Mise. Rep. 537, this order must be affirmed as hereinafter modified.
The case at bar is much stronger than the case above cited as in this case it is conceded that Alexander McKeown had an interest in the fund in question, said fund having been deposited with the defendant hank in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Faivre v. Union Dime Savings InstitutionThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891