Warren v. Penn-Harris Hotel Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
These oases arose out of the same occurrence. They were argued together on one brief, and may be disposed of in one opinion.
Both actions were based on averments that the plaintiffs, — who were husband and wife — had been received by the defendant as guests in the hotel operated and maintained by it and that in violation of the rights due them as such guests they had been humiliated, insulted, disturbed and inconvenienced by the unwarranted acts and conduct of the defendant’s employees, as set forth in the several statements of claim.
There is no doubt that Mrs. Warren was…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Hartung Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Commonwealth v. WesleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Fidelman-Danziger, Inc. v. Statler Management, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1956
- Kirstein v. Hotel Taft Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1944