Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Cancellation of the Stabio Ditch Water Right on Spearfish Creek

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1987No. 15600Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

Although I fully agree with this writing and the result, there is but one objection and line of thought to which I cannot subscribe.

Although I agree with the concept that equitable estoppel should not be established in favor of Johnson, I disagree with the statement that “[t]he essential element of equitable estoppel is fraud.”

I have written at great length on this subject, in this Court, that is, the subject of equitable estoppel, and academically attempted to delineate various types of estop-pel and the ingredients thereof. See L.R. Foy Constr. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant, 399 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sander v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Matter of Estate of WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Roseth v. St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rapid City Area School District No. 51-4 v. Black Hills & Western Tours, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API