Dougrey v. Topping & Holme
New York Court of Chancery
This case came before the court upon a motion to dissolve an injunction. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the chancellor.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
This is an application by the defend.ants to dissolve an injunction, granted upon the filing of the bill in this cause, restraining the defendant Margaret Topping *95from proceeding to recover her doxver in a lot and brewery in Lansingburgh. The complainant waived the necessity of an answer on oath; but that did not prevent the defendants from swearing to their answer with a view to a'dissolution of the injunction. As they have not availed themselves of the right to deny the equity of the bill on oath for this purpose, the answer must be laid out of _the question in deciding upon…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Tilton v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Jackson ex dem. Loucks v. ChurchillNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Foster v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Wiseman v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Ahin v. OpeleHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.