East Ohio Gas Co. v. Cunning

*153OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

With reference to the first assignment of error, we have carefully examined the testimony complained of, especially the testimony of the witness Thomas, and we are of the opinion, upon the authority of Cohen v Gas Co., 121 N. Y. Supp. 956, that said testimony was not erroneously admitted, but on the contrary was properly received as bearing upon the question of notice to the Gas Co. The other claimed errors in the admission and rejection of evidence have been considered, and we find no prejudicial error therein.

The second assignment of error has to do with the trial…