Bruce v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of America
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.
In determining whether or not there has been a change in conditions, the inquiry must necessarily relate to a definite period of time. That period is the time which has elapsed since the last preceding adjudication—that is to say, since the conditions were last officially determined. The compensation agreement has not been approved by the Industrial Board, and therefore has not become an award. It follows that the petition for a review of “the award” on account of a change in conditions, was premature. There was no award to review. Acts 1919 p. 158, § 8020c2 Burns' Supp. 1921, § 9490 Burns…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pedlow v. Swartz Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Indianapolis Bleaching Co. v. MorganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co., Plant 9 v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Inman v. Carl Furst Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Callahan v. Lovelace Truck ServiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. KilburneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Swift & Co. v. BobichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.