Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Stanley D. Dowd and Richard Brown, Jr. v. United Steelworkers of America, Local No. 286

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2001No. 00-2424NEPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHansen, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from that portion of subpart 11(B) of the court’s opinion wherein the court concludes that the statutory term “employees” in 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(b)(3) really means “members” when a labor organization’s liability is determined. I readily concur in the balance of the court’s opinion.

As outrageously egregious as the evidence supporting the jury’s verdict shows the racially motivated conduct of some of the union members and union stewards to have been, and irrespective of how strongly I believe the plaintiffs should be compensated for their emotional distress as an abstract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Commissioner v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. Steven Curtis McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Howard McAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API