Holdridge v. Board of Education of Keenesburg RE-3
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Judge PIERCE
dissenting.
Most of the basic facts are not in dispute in this action. The principal fact that cannot be avoided is that the only written contract of employment that Holdridge had over the many years that she taught in the Keenes-burg Schools was with BOCES. Although there were other contracts between the School District and BOCES that allowed BOCES to provide the services of Holdridge to the School District and that further provided that the School District would pay BOCES for those services, there was never a contract between Holdridge and the School District. Therefore,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Big Sandy School District No. 100-J v. CarrollSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- University of Colorado v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Gavend v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Laybourn v. WrapeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Nunnally v. HildermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.