Legal Opinion

Pryme Construction Corp. v. Nickolson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1963No. 3262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellees brought this action against defendant-appellant, alleging they had purchased a home from defendant under a contract containing a warranty of a dry basement for one year, and seeking damages for the breach of that warranty. Defendant filed an answer denying “each and every allegation” of the complaint. At pretrial defendant admitted execution of the contract, but denied breach of the warranty. At trial defendant, then represented by counsel different from those who filed its answer and represented it at pretrial, offered evidence that the house was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Resnick v. Abner B. Cohen Advertising, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Levy v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Mayer v. BuchananDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Penick v. Frank E. Basil, Inc. of DelawareDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  2. Watkins v. Atlantic Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API