Legal Opinion
State v. Shy
Clark County Court of Common Pleas
Decided January 23, 1922Published
1Opinion of the CourtGeiger, J.
The defendant was tried upon an affidavit, the essential part of which is as follows:
“One William A. 'Shy did then and there have and possess property designed for the purpose of the manufacture of intoxicating liquors intended for use in the violation of law, and which had been used in violation of law. to-wit, copper tanks, and lids, four, six, eight and ten gallons capacities, with copper connections and clamps; that the having and possessing of said property, designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, intended for use in violation of law as aforesaid by the said William A. Shy,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Commonwealth v. KentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1843