Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 7, 2007No. 2006-CA-001013-MR, 2006-CA-001239-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANMETER, Judge.

In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held that persons who commit capital crimes when they are under the age of eighteen are not subject to the death penalty. The issue we must decide in this case is whether Kevin Stanford, a juvenile at the time of his crimes in 1981 and whose death sentence was commuted to life in prison without possibility of parole in 2003, is entitled to a new sentencing hearing. We hold that he is not and therefore affirm the Jefferson Circuit Court.

In 1982, a jury convicted Kevin Stanford of murder, robbery first degree, and sodomy first…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Stanford v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kevin Stanford v. Phil Parker, Warden, Kentucky State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Stanford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leonard v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dayton Jones v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  3. Kevin Nigel Stanford v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API