Legal Opinion

State v. Ricks

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2013No. 2011-1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Ricks, 136 Ohio St.3d 356,

2013-Ohio-3712.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RICKS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Ricks, 136 Ohio St.3d 356,

2013-Ohio-3712.] Admission of testimonial, out-of-court statements of alleged accomplice who did not testify at defendant’s trial violated defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10, of the Ohio Constitution. (No. 2011-1912—Submitted January 23, 2013—Decided September 5, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Erie County,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State v. StefankoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022