Legal Opinion

In re Farley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the petitioner, William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 16th day of January, 1912, denying the petitioner’s motion for an injunction, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of February, 1912, denying said motion after a reargument.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

The State Excise Commissioner applied under section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 34 [Laws of 1909, chap. 39], as amd. by Laws of 1909, chap. 281) for an injunction restraining the respondent from trafficking in liquors contrary to the provisions of said statute at No. 120 West Thirty-eighth street, in the borough of Manhattan. A liquor tax certificate issued to one Elise Ruehl for premises Nos. 1384 and 1386 Broadway was revoked by an order of this court on April 1, 1911, on the sole ground that the premises had been suffered to become disorderly. Pending the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. People ex rel. City of New York v. JansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API