Legal Opinion

State v. Chitwood

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1952No. 1016PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the original hearing in this cause the claimed immunity of the defendant from prosecution under the provisions of article 2, section 19, of the state constitution was predicated upon the assumption of counsel, both for the state and for the defendant, that the provisions applied to witnesses testifying before a grand jury. As shown in the original opinion, defendant was so advised by counsel for the state, before he was called upon to testify before the grand jury.

Article 2, section 19, of the constitution reads as follows: “Any person having knowledge or possession of. facts that tend…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Blau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. State v. LovellArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. Barragan-SierraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State v. CotaArizona Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API