Legal Opinion
Meeker v. Stuart
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 21, 1960No. 1149-58PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is an action for an injunction and damages based on alleged interference with the good will of a business in which the defendant sold an interest to the plaintiff, and based further on an alleged violation of an employer-employee relation. The defendant counterclaims first, for balance due on a promissory note given by the plaintiff to the defendant, and second for damages claimed to have been caused by a preliminary injunction heretofore issued by another Judge of this Court, and later reversed by the Court of Appeals for this Circuit.
The plaintiff, Theodore C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Methodist Churches of New York v. . BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Lawrence v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Janssen v. ShownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Alabama Mills v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Seaboard Finance Company, Seaboard Finance Company, Cross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Vojak v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.(Arwell Div.) v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. SquierNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- American Bible Society v. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.