Bowlus v. Whatley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by George A. Bowlus and others against William J. Whatley and others. Judgment for defendants was reversed by the Court of Appeal, and, an application for rehearing having been denied, defendants Whatley and others applied for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
SOMMEERVILLE, J.
[1] Motion has been made to dismiss this application for a writ of review, on tne ground that the record fails to show that rehearing had been asked for in the Court of Appeal, and had been refused, In answer to this motion, counsel for applicant files affidavit to the effect that he instructed the clerk of the Court of Appeal to insert in the record a certified copy of an extract from the minutes, showing that a rehearing had been refused. To the answer to the motion to dismiss is annexed a certified extract from the minutes, reciting that the application…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Michael v. State ex rel. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Succession of HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Bell v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Averette v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Castleman v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.